The fields of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are consistently becoming more and more prevalent. One of the major concerns in these domains has been the capacity of machines to replicate the intricacy of human cognition and language. The question still arises whether robots are really capable of replicating the methodical compositionality that characterises human language and cognition.
Systematicity in human learning is the ability of people to acquire new ideas and methodically integrate them with preexisting ones. Systematic compositionality is a remarkable ability of human language and intellect. The idea is similar to solving algebraic equations in that it requires the capacity to generate and comprehend new combinations of well-known elements.
The problem of systematicity has not been overcome in neural networks despite substantial progress in this field. This brings up the well-known claim made by Fodor and Pylyshyn that artificial neural networks are insufficient as human mind models since they are incapable of having this capacity. In response to that, a team of researchers has recently shown how neural networks might attain human-like systematicity by using a new technique known as Meta-Learning for Compositionality (MLC).
Neural networks have been trained on a sequence of dynamic composing problems using this approach. The study used an instruction learning paradigm to conduct behavioural studies to compare human and machine performance. MLC bridges the gap between humans and machines in terms of systematic compositionality. This approach functions by directing neural network training via an ever-changing stream of composing tasks. It guides the neural network’s learning process via high-level guidance and human examples, as opposed to depending on manually constructed internal representations or inductive biases. It enables a type of meta-learning that helps the network acquire the appropriate learning abilities.
The team has shared that they carried out some human behavioural experiments to evaluate this approach. They assessed seven distinct models using an instruction learning paradigm to see which might best balance two essential components of human-like generalisation: flexibility and systematicity. The outcomes were quite impressive as MLC was the only examined model that could mimic both systematicity and flexibility, which are necessary to replicate human-like generalisation. It did not rely on excessively flexible but non-systematic neural networks, nor did it impose inflexible, perfectly systematic, but rigid probabilistic symbolic models.
The MLC technique is especially impressive because it does not require complex or specialised neural network topologies. Rather, it optimises a normal neural network for compositional skills. The MLC-powered network matched human systematic generalisation exceptionally well in this head-to-head comparison.
In conclusion, MLC paves the way for a plethora of uses by proving that machines can attain human-like systematicity in language and reasoning. It demonstrates how machine learning systems can mimic the systematicity of human cognition, potentially improving human capabilities in a range of cognitive activities, such as problem-solving, creative thinking, and Natural Language Processing. This breakthrough definitely holds the potential to revolutionise the field of Artificial Intelligence by bringing humans closer to machines that can not only mimic but truly understand and replicate the systematic nature of human cognition.
Check out the Paper. All Credit For This Research Goes To the Researchers on This Project. Also, don’t forget to join our 32k+ ML SubReddit, 40k+ Facebook Community, Discord Channel, and Email Newsletter, where we share the latest AI research news, cool AI projects, and more.
If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..
We are also on Telegram and WhatsApp.
Tanya Malhotra is a final year undergrad from the University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Dehradun, pursuing BTech in Computer Science Engineering with a specialization in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.She is a Data Science enthusiast with good analytical and critical thinking, along with an ardent interest in acquiring new skills, leading groups, and managing work in an organized manner.